How to set goals: what 35 years of research shows
Goal-setting is one of the most studied topics in psychology, and the findings are practical. Here is how to set goals the research supports: specific and challenging, chosen for your own reasons, tracked with feedback and backed by if-then plans.
Free by email: the opening sections, the full Five Domain Diagnostic and Chapter One. No card. Unsubscribe at any time.
Why most goals fade
- Too vague. “Get healthier” has no finish line.
- Not really yours. Chosen to please someone else.
- No feedback. No way to know if you are on track until it is too late.
What the research shows
Edwin Locke and Gary Latham summarized 35 years of studies: specific, difficult goals consistently led to higher performance than urging people to “do their best,” across more than 100 tasks and more than 40,000 participants. Goals work best when people are committed to them and get feedback on progress (Locke and Latham, 2002).
Three more findings complete the picture. Goals that match your own interests and values draw more effort (Sheldon and Elliot, 1999). If-then plans, “when X happens, I will do Y,” had a medium-to-large effect on reaching goals across 94 tests (Gollwitzer and Sheeran, 2006). And tracking progress helps, more so when it is reported to others (Harkin and colleagues, 2016).
Read the first chapter free. Free by email: the opening sections, the full Five Domain Diagnostic and Chapter One. No card. Unsubscribe at any time.
Read the first chapter free →A five-step method
- Choose for your own reasons. Ask: would I want this if no one knew?
- Make it specific and hard. A number and a date, set high enough to stretch you.
- Write two if-then plans. For your two most likely obstacles.
- Track it weekly. Plan, actual, gap.
- Tell someone. Report progress at a fixed time; see accountability partners.
One caution
For complex work, a hard outcome goal can backfire while you are still learning; Locke and Latham found goal effects smaller on complex tasks. Early on, set a learning goal, such as trying three approaches, before you set the result.
Goal check
Rate each statement for your main goal now. 1 means not true; 5 means very true.
1 = not true · 5 = very true
A reflection prompt, not a psychological test or advice. Your answers stay in your browser; if you continue to the free chapter, only your total is added to the link.
Where APSP fits
APSP sets goals across five domains at once, so a career goal does not quietly cost your health or relationships. The first chapter’s Five Domain Diagnostic shows where to set your next goal; Framework 21, the First Quarter Protocol, turns it into a 90-day plan. Make the plan stick with habits.
Do it with others. A change is easier to hold when other people see your progress. In a meta-analysis of 138 studies, people who reported their progress publicly or recorded it reached their goals more often (Harkin and colleagues, 2016). Vcomm is 12 months of self-directed accountability among professionals who work from the same model, so you are not redesigning your life alone.
Questions about setting goals
What are SMART goals?
A popular checklist: specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound. Research supports specific goals with feedback; it also finds that harder goals, not merely achievable ones, lead to higher performance.
How many goals should I set at once?
Few. One main goal per area of life you are working on, with one leading.
What if I miss my goal?
Review the gap, adjust the plan or the date, and keep the tracking. A missed goal with good data is still progress.
Sources
- Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: a 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. Source
- Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: the self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 482–497.
- Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119.
- Harkin, B., Webb, T. L., Chang, B. P. I., et al. (2016). Does monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 142(2), 198–229. APA summary. Source
Checked October 16, 2026. Evidence labels follow the APSP evidence tiers. Educational content; not therapy or professional advice.
Keep exploring
Read the first chapter free.
Free by email: the opening sections, the full Five Domain Diagnostic and Chapter One. No card. Unsubscribe at any time.
Want to set your goals with others, live? The APSP Live Session: 90 minutes online with live Q&A, $98.